|
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Search
ISAKOS:
|
|
Winter 2001 Newsletter Editor's Note
Stephen S. Burkhart,
M.D., San Antonio, Texas, USA
ISAKOS Newsletter Editor
Progress. In a word, that is what we believe
the discipline of arthroscopy represents. But there is a vast
orthopaedic world outside the realm of arthroscopy, and the surgeons
that populate that world have often been slow to embrace arthroscopic
techniques, particularly those that infringe upon their "territory."
Earlier this month, I had the
unique opportunity to participate in a debate on the program
of the Closed Meeting of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons,
an organization to which I belong. The topic of the debate was
whether rotator cuff repair should be performed by arthroscopic
or open means. The theme of my argument for arthroscopic repair
was that arthroscopy represented progress and that progress was
inevitable. In order to avoid being misinterpreted, I emphasized
that the arthroscopic approach did not forsake the principles
of Codman and Neer, but rather built upon those principles to
provide an improved method of treatment for rotator cuff tears.
Needless to say, this argument was a "hard sell" to
that particular audience, which was composed primarily of the
most prominent open shoulder surgeons in the United States.
At the conclusion of the debate, the moderator, Dr. Rich Hawkins,
took a vote of the audience and, as expected, the vast majority
voted that they believed rotator cuff repair should be done by
open means. However, Dr. Hawkins then asked the audience how
many of them had attempted arthroscopic cuff repairs and believed
that the future of rotator cuff repair would lie with arthroscopic
techniques; approximately two-thirds of the audience raised their
hands. My initial reaction was that the vote had been somewhat
schizophrenic. This group of prominent open shoulder surgeons
wanted to suppress arthroscopic cuff repair (one must assume
to protect their "turf"), yet they were beginning to
experiment with it because they recognized it would inevitably
replace open repair.
The nature of progress is that
it is relentless and always prevails. Progress is always the
clear winner. Yet progress can be both threatening and empowering.
It threatens those who attempt to suppress it and empowers those
who embrace it as well as those who benefit from it. If arthroscopic
rotator cuff repair truly benefits patients, then patients will
demand it. As demand increases, the entire profession will ultimately
recognize this technique for what it is and what it represents
... progress.
Next Article:
President's Message
Return to Table
of Contents
|